UniquackAI Parsing
Turn source material into structured questions.
- PDF / worksheet → question
- Proposed answer + explanation
- Visual + source reference
Uniquack for teachers
Teach more. Rebuild less.
Turn materials into Review Drafts. Design new questions with Blueprint. Keep approved content in your Question Bank, then assign a selection and teach from the evidence.
Original concept photography
Your Teacher Workspace
Import once. Review once. Reuse when it matters.
Review & Approve
AI prepares the draft. You decide what becomes teaching content.
- Edit / Needs evidence
- Reject / Approve
Question Bank
Your reviewed teaching content, ready to use again.
- Reviewed questions + source lineage
- Difficulty + concept / reasoning tags
- Ownership + permissions
Blueprint
Tell the AI what the question must test before it writes the question.
- Learning focus + reasoning target
- Expected evidence + question form
- Difficulty
Assignments
Choose reviewed questions and send only that work to students.
- Question Bank → selected questions
- Classroom → formal responses
Class Evidence
Find the pattern behind the scores.
- Completion + attempts
- Question performance + recurring difficulty
- Next teaching move
Turn source material into structured questions you can actually use.
Uniquack identifies questions, proposed answers and explanations, visuals, metadata and source references from your materials and turns them into editable Review Drafts.
PDFs, worksheets, notesYour question.
Your question.
Its original source.
Question
Explain how a change in the system affects the outcome.
Supporting material
Original page retainedSource text, diagrams and answer guidance.
AI Parsing
Editable Review Draft
Pending review- Question
- Editable question content
- Answer & explanation
- AI-proposed, ready to check
- Visuals & metadata
- Supporting assets and question attributes
- Source reference
- Back to the original material
AI prepares the question. You decide what becomes teaching content.
Compare, edit, request more evidence, reject or approve.
Not PDF-to-chat. PDF-to-structured teaching content.
- Source-aware
- The original question and source reference stay attached.
- Structured
- Question, answer, explanation, visuals and teaching metadata become reviewable fields.
- Reviewable
- AI proposals enter a visible draft state. You decide what is ready.
- Reusable
- Approved content joins your Question Bank, ready to select again.
- Uncertainty-aware
- Content needing attention stays visible instead of silently becoming final.
AI ParsingTurn source material into structured questions you can actually use.
- Input
- PDFs, worksheets, notes and teacher-owned source material.
- Action
- Identify and structure questions, proposed answers and explanations, relevant visuals, metadata and exact source references.
- Output
- Editable Review Drafts, with the original source attached.
- Value
- Get reusable teaching content instead of a one-off AI chat response.
Review DraftAI prepares the question. You decide what becomes teaching content.
- Input
- An AI-proposed draft and its source evidence.
- Action
- Compare against the source; edit the question, answer, explanation and difficulty; request more evidence, reject or approve.
- Output
- An Approved Question, or a draft explicitly kept out of teaching use.
- Value
- Decide what is ready before students receive it.
AI Parsing → Review Draft → Teacher Approval → Question Bank
Question Bank.
Your reviewed teaching content, ready to use again.
The question should outlive the file it came from.
Every approved question enters a teacher-controlled Question Bank with its source, answer, explanation, visuals, instructional metadata and permissions still attached.
Energy transfer through a changing system
- Prompt
- 240 J enters a sealed gas as heat; 90 J leaves as work. Find the change in internal energy.
- Approved answer / explanation
- +150 J. Using ΔU = Q − W, the gas retains 240 − 90 = 150 J.
- Source lineage / visual evidence
- Energy transfer.pdf · Page 1 · question 1 · energy-balance diagram
- Difficulty / instructional metadata
- Apply · energy conservation · system-boundary reasoning
- Ownership / permissions
- Teacher-controlled Library · Owner / Editor / Viewer
- Reusable assignment identity
- The same reviewed question stays linked across selected assignments.
Store reviewed questions
Find questions by what they teach
Preview before assigning
Reuse without re-importing
Select questions without exposing the whole Bank
Collaborate with explicit permissions
AI Parsing → Review Draft → Teacher Approval → Question Bank
Blueprint → Generated Question Draft → Teacher Review → Question Bank
Question Bank → selected Assignment → Practice. Course Builder also draws on reviewed Bank questions to organize teaching sequences.
The Teacher Library owns the workspace; the Question Bank holds its reviewed inventory. Neither is the Public Question Library.
Explore a reviewed question in useTell the AI what the question must test before it writes the question.
A Blueprint is a reusable question-design specification. Define the learning focus, reasoning students must demonstrate, expected answer evidence, question form and difficulty. Uniquack uses those requirements to create new question drafts that preserve the same instructional intent.
A prompt asks AI for a question.Try the question design console
A Blueprint defines what a good question must require.
Blueprint / Interactive preview
- Learning focus
- Distance vs displacement
- Reasoning target
- Identify sign changes before integrating
- Expected answer evidence
- Sign intervals + calculations + explanation
- Question form
- FRQ
- Difficulty
- Apply & justify
Generated Question Draft
Teacher Review → Approved Question → Question Bank
BlueprintTell the AI what the question must test before it writes the question.
- Input
- Learning focus, reasoning target, expected answer evidence, question form and difficulty.
- Action
- Use a reusable, ownable, versioned question-generation specification to guide a new question draft.
- Output
- A new Question Draft that still requires Teacher Review.
- Value
- Create questions that preserve the same instructional intent.
Interactive preview. The example drafts are authored; no generation request is sent.
Blueprint VersioningReuse and refine the design—not just the generated question.
- Input
- An owned Blueprint and revised instructional requirements.
- Action
- Save and version the specification while retaining its prior design.
- Output
- A reusable version of the question-generation specification.
- Value
- Refine the instructional design without rebuilding it from scratch.
Product specification; persistent version management is not part of this website preview.
Choose reviewed questions.
Send only that work.
Select approved Question Bank questions, choose a classroom and deliver an assignment. Classroom membership does not open your source Library.
AssignmentsChoose reviewed questions and send only that work to students.
- Input
- Selected approved Question Bank questions and a classroom.
- Action
- Deliver that selection as assigned work.
- Output
- An assignment containing only the chosen questions.
- Value
- Assigning selected questions does not expose the rest of the teacher's private Library.
ClassroomsOne place for assignments, students, and formal learning evidence.
- Input
- A teacher, invited students and selected assignments.
- Action
- Create a class, invite students, distribute assignments and review submitted work.
- Output
- A classroom workspace for delivery and formal evidence.
- Value
- Keep class work together while the source Library remains separate.
Course BuilderTurn reviewed content into a sequence students can work through.
- Input
- Selected reviewed questions and instructional material.
- Action
- Organize that content into a teaching sequence, then move chosen work into assignments.
- Output
- A teaching sequence with selected assignment content.
- Value
- Reuse reviewed material across lessons.
Product workflow described here; no course editing or delivery occurs on this website.
See the question, the submitted response, and what happened next.
Keep the exact question, submitted response, attempt history, completion, feedback and question performance attached to the assignment before deciding what to reteach.
Read the work behind the score.
Completion, attempts, question performance and recurring difficulty remain tied to selected formal work, not unrelated private study.
Teacher feedback stays beside the exact question and submitted response.
Choose the next teaching move.
- Explain the missing reasoning step.
- Select a contrasting Question Bank question.
- Choose guided practice or the next assignment.
Assignment EvidenceSee the question, the submitted response, and what happened next.
- Input
- Formal assignment work, not unrelated private study.
- Action
- Keep the exact question, submitted response, attempt history, completion, feedback and question-level performance attached to the assignment.
- Output
- A question-level formal evidence record.
- Value
- Read the original work before deciding what to reteach.
Teacher FeedbackRespond to the work without losing the context.
- Input
- A student response on a specific assignment question.
- Action
- Leave feedback attached to the student, assignment and question.
- Output
- Feedback the learner can reopen beside the original work.
- Value
- Return to the exact work that needs attention.
Class EvidenceFind the pattern behind the scores.
- Input
- Authorized formal responses across an assignment.
- Action
- Compare completion, attempts, question performance and recurring difficulties.
- Output
- An assignment-scoped view of recurring difficulties.
- Value
- Choose what to explain again using the responses that support the pattern.
Next Teaching MoveTurn evidence into a concrete teaching decision.
- Input
- Formal question-level evidence and recurring class difficulties.
- Action
- Choose what to explain again, which question to ask and which students need guided practice.
- Output
- A chosen explanation, practice selection or next assignment requirement.
- Value
- Decide what the next lesson or assignment should test.
Students can continue learning independently outside assigned work without turning every private study action into teacher evidence.
Follow the evidence in the demoCommunity Question Hub
Discover, adapt, and organize reviewed questions from across the community.
Find questions by subject, concept, reasoning target, difficulty or question type. Preview the prompt, answer, explanation and metadata before bringing it into your workspace.
Authored examples · Local illustration. No catalog item is saved or shared with a real account.
Particle motion
- Concept
- Distance vs displacement
- Reasoning
- Partition by velocity sign
- Difficulty / form
- Apply & justify / Multi-part FRQ
Energy transfer
- Concept
- Energy conservation
- Reasoning
- Account for the system boundary
- Difficulty / form
- Apply / Short response
Reaction rates
- Concept
- Average reaction rate
- Reasoning
- Use a change over an interval
- Difficulty / form
- Apply / Data response
Cell transport
- Concept
- Osmosis
- Reasoning
- Connect concentration to net flow
- Difficulty / form
- Explain / Diagram response
Source perspectives
- Concept
- Source perspective
- Reasoning
- Compare framing and evidence
- Difficulty / form
- Analyze / Source comparison
Argument & evidence
- Concept
- Claim and evidence
- Reasoning
- Distinguish relevance from proof
- Difficulty / form
- Evaluate / Evidence response
Save a private copy or fork an editable version without changing the original. Collaborate through Owner, Editor and Viewer roles inside shared Libraries. Public does not automatically mean Verified.
Bring your learning context into the AI you already use.
Choose the learning context that should leave Uniquack. The MCP internal beta is testing that handoff to ChatGPT, Claude or another external AI. Native AI remains part of Uniquack; independent study does not require a teacher or classroom. Inspect the returned explanation, plan or teaching artifact before keeping or using it.
Explore the two-way connectionMCP integration · Internal beta
Only what you choose
Selected formal responses + teaching materials
No unrestricted Library accessSelected context outChatGPT / external AIDraft artifact back
A lesson plan or teaching deck for review
You inspect it. You choose what to keep in Uniquack.
MCP integration · Internal beta. Explore the workflows below; the interactive examples use sample content.
Class Learning SummaryA class learning summary limited to the selected evidence.
- Input
- Selected formal assignment evidence.
- Action
- Identify the highest-priority reteaching pattern and the responses supporting it.
- Output
- A class learning summary limited to the selected evidence.
- Value
- Choose the difficulty to address without accessing private student study.
Lesson PlanA 45-minute lesson plan for teacher review.
- Input
- A reviewed class summary and lesson requirements.
- Action
- Draft a timed diagnostic, explanation, differentiated practice, exit ticket and follow-up.
- Output
- A 45-minute lesson plan for teacher review.
- Value
- Turn assignment evidence into a teaching sequence.
Teaching DeckA six-slide teaching pack for teacher review.
- Input
- A reviewed lesson plan.
- Action
- Arrange examples, graphs, practice and teacher notes.
- Output
- A six-slide teaching pack for teacher review.
- Value
- Prepare lesson materials without treating generated drafts as approved content.
Import once. Review once. Reuse when it matters.
Follow a source into review, select an assignment and inspect the submitted response.